Understanding SEER and Energy Savings
When it's time to replace your air conditioner, you will be faced with a choice: buy a standard-efficiency unit, or pay a premium for a high SEER AC. The higher the SEER (Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio), the more efficient the unit is, and the less electricity it consumes. For context, the energy efficiency ratio (EER) measures steady-state cooling, while the seasonal energy efficiency ratio (SEER) measures average cooling across a whole season.
But how do you know if that premium price tag is actually worth it? Our SEER savings calculator uses industry-standard energy estimation formulas based on your specific ac seer rating to estimate your annual operating costs and lifetime savings. Whether you're installing a new SEER HVAC system or a mini-split, a higher seer efficiency rating always translates to lower utility bills.
You will see the same number written several ways: air conditioner SEER rating, AC unit SEER rating, seasonal energy efficiency rating, and SEER 2 rating on anything built since 2023. They all describe one thing, cooling delivered per watt-hour over a season. So the tool above works as an AC SEER calculator, an HVAC SEER savings calculator and a heat pump SEER savings calculator alike, because the cooling arithmetic is identical for all three. Switch either rating to SEER2 and it becomes a SEER2 savings calculator, or a SEER2 energy savings calculator if you think in kilowatt-hours. Add the price gap and it is a SEER cost savings calculator, since the payback line is the saving set against the cost.
What Does SEER Efficiency Mean?
SEER efficiency means how much cooling an air conditioner delivers for every unit of electricity it uses over a full cooling season. SEER stands for Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio, and it is calculated by dividing the total cooling output (in BTUs) by the total electricity consumed (in watt-hours) across an entire season of typical temperature swings.
In plain terms: a higher SEER number means a more efficient unit and a lower electric bill for the same amount of cooling. A 20 SEER air conditioner uses roughly half the electricity of an old 10 SEER unit to remove the exact same amount of heat from your home. SEER does not measure cooling power or how fast a room cools; it only measures how efficiently the unit turns electricity into cooling.
This is different from EER (Energy Efficiency Ratio), which measures efficiency at a single fixed outdoor temperature. Because SEER averages performance across a whole season, it is the more realistic number for estimating your annual running costs, which is exactly what the calculator above does.
The Variables That Drive Your Savings
- Efficiency Jump: The biggest factor is the gap between your old unit and the new one. Upgrading from an ancient 8 SEER to an 18 SEER2 will cut your cooling bills by more than half.
- Climate (Cooling Hours): If you live in Florida or Arizona where the AC runs 2,000 hours a year, a high SEER unit will pay for itself very quickly. If you live in Maine where it only runs 500 hours a year, it may never pay for itself.
- Electricity Rates: Areas with high utility rates see a much faster return on investment when upgrading efficiency.
SEER2 vs SEER Comparison Chart
In 2023, the Department of Energy updated their testing standards, replacing SEER with SEER2. The new test simulates real-world conditions much better by increasing the external static pressure - essentially making the system push air against a higher resistance, similar to actual residential ductwork.
Because the test is harder, a SEER2 rating looks numerically lower than its equivalent older SEER rating. A good rule of thumb is that SEER2 is about 4.5% lower than SEER. Below is a quick SEER2 vs SEER comparison chart to help you map old units to new standards:
| Old SEER Rating | Equivalent SEER2 Rating |
|---|---|
| 13.0 SEER | 12.4 SEER2 |
| 14.0 SEER | 13.4 SEER2 |
| 15.0 SEER | 14.3 SEER2 |
| 16.0 SEER | 15.2 SEER2 |
| 18.0 SEER | 17.1 SEER2 |
| 20.0 SEER | 19.0 SEER2 |
Minimum SEER Rating: The Current Federal Standard
Before comparing upgrades it helps to know the floor, because the base quote you are given will sit right on it. The minimum SEER rating changed in January 2023 and now depends on where the unit is installed:
| Equipment and Region | Minimum SEER2 | Old SEER Equivalent |
|---|---|---|
| Split AC, North | 13.4 | 14 |
| Split AC, Southeast and Southwest, under 45,000 BTU | 14.3 | 15 |
| Split AC, Southeast and Southwest, 45,000 BTU and up | 13.8 | 14.5 |
| Split heat pump, all states | 14.3 | 15 |
These are the current SEER ratings the Department of Energy requires, so a standard SEER rating today means 13.4 or 14.3 SEER2 depending on your state. Anything a contractor calls high efficiency should be measured against that floor, not against the 10 SEER unit being removed.
The minimum SEER rating by state follows three federal regions, so there is no separate figure for each state. The Southeast is Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and the District of Columbia. The Southwest is Arizona, California, Nevada and New Mexico. Every other state is in the North.
Looking at the minimum SEER rating by year also tells you roughly what an old system is, because most builders installed the cheapest unit allowed at the time:
| Installed | Federal Minimum for a Split AC |
|---|---|
| 1992 to 2005 | 10 SEER |
| 2006 to 2014 | 13 SEER |
| 2015 to 2022 | 13 SEER in the North, 14 SEER in the Southeast and Southwest |
| 2023 onward | 13.4 SEER2 in the North, 14.3 SEER2 in the Southeast and Southwest |
So if the nameplate is unreadable, the SEER rating of old air conditioners can be estimated from the install date: a system from the late 1990s is very likely a 10, and one from around 2010 is very likely a 13. Enter that as the old rating in the calculator.
SEER to SEER2 Conversion and SEER2 to SEER Conversion
The chart above runs one way, so here is the arithmetic for both directions. To go from SEER to SEER2, multiply by 0.955. To go the other way, from SEER2 back to SEER, divide by 0.955. That is all there is to it. If you would rather not do it by hand, the tool at the top works as a SEER to SEER2 calculator: mark one rating SEER and the other SEER2 and it converts before comparing. People also call that a SEER 2 calculator.
But here is where it actually matters. You get two quotes, one of them lists a SEER number and the other lists SEER2, and they look like different tiers when they are not. A 16 SEER unit is about 15.3 SEER2, so a quote showing 15.2 SEER2 is not a downgrade from one showing 16 SEER. It is the same machine described by a harder test. So before you compare two quotes, put both on the same scale, otherwise you will talk yourself into paying for an upgrade that does not exist. Anything sold new today is rated in SEER2, so if a quote still shows plain SEER it is either old stock or the salesperson quoting the friendlier number.
AC SEER Rating Chart: How Efficiency Impacts Savings
Upgrading your seer air conditioner has diminishing returns. The biggest savings happen when upgrading from a very old, inefficient unit (like an 8 or 10 SEER) to a modern baseline (14 or 16 SEER). Upgrading from an already highly efficient unit to an ultra-high efficiency unit yields smaller marginal savings.
Here is a basic seer rating chart showing the estimated cooling cost reduction when upgrading from an old 10 SEER unit to higher tiers:
| New SEER Rating | Estimated Energy Reduction vs 10 SEER |
|---|---|
| 14 SEER | ~ 28% Savings |
| 16 SEER | ~ 37% Savings |
| 18 SEER | ~ 44% Savings |
| 20 SEER | ~ 50% Savings |
| 22 SEER | ~ 54% Savings |
What Each SEER Rating Means: 13 SEER to 22 SEER
A rating on its own tells you little, so this table turns each one into a yearly cooling bill. It uses the same reference home as the other charts here: a 3 ton system, $0.17 per kWh, 1,200 cooling hours for a moderate climate and 2,800 for a hot one.
| Rating | As SEER2 | Cooling Cost per Year moderate / hot | Saved vs 14 SEER moderate / hot |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 SEER | 12.4 SEER2 | $565 / $1,318 | costs $40 / $94 more |
| 14 SEER | 13.4 SEER2 | $525 / $1,224 | baseline |
| 15 SEER | 14.3 SEER2 | $490 / $1,142 | $35 / $82 |
| 16 SEER | 15.3 SEER2 | $459 / $1,071 | $66 / $153 |
| 17 SEER | 16.2 SEER2 | $432 / $1,008 | $93 / $216 |
| 18 SEER | 17.2 SEER2 | $408 / $952 | $117 / $272 |
| 20 SEER | 19.1 SEER2 | $367 / $857 | $157 / $367 |
| 22 SEER | 21.0 SEER2 | $334 / $779 | $191 / $445 |
Read down the last column and the pattern is plain. A 16 SEER rating saves about $66 a year over a 14 in a moderate climate, an 18 SEER rating about $117, and a 22 SEER rating about $191. Each step up is worth less than the one before, which is why a 13 SEER rating or a 14 SEER rating is still a sensible buy where summers are short.
Put another way, the energy savings per SEER rating point shrink as you climb. In the moderate column the step from 14 to 15 is worth about $35 a year, 15 to 16 about $31, 16 to 17 about $27 and 17 to 18 about $24. So the cost savings per SEER rating are never a flat figure, and any quote that promises a fixed saving for every point is using the wrong sum.
SEER Savings Chart: Every Old Rating Against Every New One
A SEER savings chart is only useful if it starts from the unit you actually own, so this AC SEER savings chart runs from an 8 SEER system up to a 14. Find your old rating down the side and the new one across the top. The figure is the share of your cooling electricity the new unit no longer uses, rounded down to the whole percent.
| Old Rating | New 14 SEER | New 16 SEER | New 18 SEER | New 20 SEER |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 SEER | 42% | 50% | 55% | 60% |
| 10 SEER | 28% | 37% | 44% | 50% |
| 12 SEER | 14% | 25% | 33% | 40% |
| 13 SEER | 7% | 18% | 27% | 35% |
| 14 SEER | - | 12% | 22% | 30% |
Read down any column of this SEER rating savings chart and the pattern is plain: the older the unit you are replacing, the more every new rating saves, and the less the choice between new ratings matters. The SEER chart savings are shares of your cooling bill, so replacing an 8 SEER system with a basic 14 already removes 42% of it. Paying extra for a 20 adds 18 points on top of that. Tip: the replacement itself does most of the saving, so decide to replace first and choose the tier second.
SEER Rating Chart Savings in Dollars, Not Percentages
Percentages are easy to quote and hard to act on, so here are the same upgrades in money. Everything below starts from a 14 SEER unit, because that is what most people are replacing or being offered as the base option, on a 3 ton system at $0.17 per kWh. The only thing that changes across the columns is how many hours a year the AC actually runs.
| Upgrade from 14 SEER to | Mild climate ~400 hrs/yr | Moderate ~1,200 hrs/yr | Hot climate ~2,800 hrs/yr | 10 years, hot climate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 SEER | $12/yr | $35/yr | $82/yr | $820 |
| 16 SEER | $22/yr | $66/yr | $154/yr | $1,540 |
| 18 SEER | $39/yr | $117/yr | $273/yr | $2,730 |
| 20 SEER | $53/yr | $158/yr | $368/yr | $3,680 |
| 22 SEER | $64/yr | $191/yr | $445/yr | $4,450 |
Look along any row and you can see why two people get opposite advice about the same unit. Going to 20 SEER saves about $53 a year in a mild climate and about $368 a year somewhere hot, and that is the same equipment doing the same job. So the honest answer to whether a high rating is worth it is that it depends far more on where you live than on which unit you buy. Put your own electricity rate and runtime into the calculator above, because $0.17 per kWh is a national average and almost nobody actually pays the average.
Why Tonnage Matters for Savings
Efficiency doesn't dictate how much cooling your home needs. A 3-ton, 14 SEER AC and a 3-ton, 20 SEER AC will both provide 36,000 BTUs of cooling. If your AC is oversized or undersized, changing the SEER rating won't fix comfort issues like short-cycling or high humidity. Always ensure you are sizing the equipment properly first before comparing efficiency tiers.
14 SEER vs 16 SEER: Which Is Worth It?
The short answer: a 16 SEER unit uses about 12–13% less cooling energy than a 14 SEER unit of the same tonnage, because savings scale with the ratio between the two ratings (14 ÷ 16 ≈ 0.875). Whether that gap is worth the higher price depends almost entirely on how many hours your AC runs each year.
In a hot, long-cooling-season climate (Florida, Texas, Arizona) where the system runs 2,000+ hours a year, the extra efficiency of 16 SEER typically pays back its price premium within a few years. In a mild or short-season climate, the two units cost so little to run that the 14 SEER is usually the smarter buy. Here is how the two tiers compare head-to-head:
| Factor | 14 SEER | 16 SEER |
|---|---|---|
| Relative energy use | Baseline | ~12–13% less |
| Upfront cost | Lower | Higher (often $500–$1,500 more) |
| Best for | Mild / short cooling season | Hot / long cooling season |
| Compressor stage | Usually single-stage | Often two-stage (better humidity control) |
Enter both ratings into the calculator above with your local electricity rate and cooling hours to see the exact dollar difference for your home.
However the question is worded, 14 vs 16 SEER, 16 SEER vs 14, or simply 14 or 16 SEER, the arithmetic above does not change. In dollars, 14 SEER vs 16 SEER energy savings come to about $66 a year for a 3 ton system in a moderate climate and about $153 in a hot one. It also holds for a heat pump in cooling mode, so 14 SEER vs 16 SEER heat pump savings in summer match the AC figures, and the winter side depends on HSPF2 instead.
One thing the rating hides is the compressor. In most product lines the 14 is single-stage and the 16 is two-stage, so 14 SEER vs 16 SEER 2 stage is really a comfort decision with a small saving attached. A two-stage unit runs longer at low speed, which is what pulls humidity out and evens out the rooms.
As a plain question: what is the difference between 14 SEER and 16 SEER, and is 16 SEER better than 14 SEER? On paper, yes. A 16 delivers 14% more cooling for each unit of electricity, which is the same thing as using 12.5% less electricity for the same cooling. It does not cool the house any faster or any colder.
Should I get 14 SEER or 16 SEER, then? Two things outside the rating matter. Higher-rated equipment has more parts, such as a second compressor stage, a variable blower and a control board, and owners point out that those cost more to repair once the warranty ends. And the federal tax credit that used to tip this choice ended for systems installed after December 31, 2025, so only a state or utility rebate can narrow the gap now.
If the two quotes are the same price, take the 16. If the 16 costs $1,000 or more extra and your summers are short, the higher SEER is not worth it on the bill alone.
14 SEER vs 16 SEER Price Difference: What It Actually Costs You
Here is the part most comparisons leave out. Knowing you save 12–13% is not enough to make the decision, because the decision is really about the number on the two quotes in front of you. So let us put both halves together.
Homeowners posting their quotes report the 14 to 16 step costing anywhere from a few hundred dollars to around $1,900 on a 2 ton system, and that spread is normal because the 16 SEER unit is often a two stage model rather than the same machine with a better rating. Now take our scenario above, a 3 ton system running 1,200 hours at $0.17 per kWh. That gives you about $66 a year in savings.
So if the quote difference is $1,900, you are paying $1,900 up front to save $66 a year. Let me put that plainly. That is roughly 27 years to break even on equipment that will not last that long. But if your installer is only asking $400 more, the same upgrade pays for itself in about six years and you keep the benefit for the rest of the unit's life. The rating is not what decides this. The price gap is.
The rule to use: divide the price difference by the yearly saving our calculator gives you. Under about 7 years, take the upgrade. Longer than the equipment will realistically last, do not. And ask for that price difference in writing, because it is the one number that actually settles the argument.
That rule needs a price gap to work on, and this calculator only handles the savings half. If you do not have two quotes in front of you yet, the central air installation cost calculator estimates what a new system runs at each efficiency tier in your region, and the full HVAC replacement cost calculator does the same when the furnace is being changed at the same time. Use either one to get the price difference, then bring it back here to see how long it takes to earn out.
16 SEER AC Unit Cost and How Long It Takes to Pay Back
A 16 SEER AC unit cost is easiest to judge as a step up from the base model, so that is how this table sets out 16 SEER air conditioner cost at each size. The prices come from our cost calculator, where the 16 SEER class is the two-stage tier and the base is single-stage, both installed in an average-cost market with the existing ducts reused. The savings compare 14.3 SEER2 with 16 SEER2 at $0.17 per kWh.
| Size | 16 SEER Class Installed | Extra Over Base | Saved per Year moderate / hot | Years to Pay Back moderate / hot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 tons | $6,000 | $1,000 | $36 / $85 | 28 / 12 |
| 3 tons | $7,200 | $1,200 | $55 / $127 | 22 / 9 |
| 4 tons | $8,900 | $1,500 | $73 / $170 | 21 / 9 |
| 5 tons | $10,200 | $1,700 | $91 / $212 | 19 / 8 |
Moderate means about 1,200 cooling hours a year and hot means about 2,800. The price difference between 14 and 16 SEER is $1,000 to $1,700 in this table, and in a moderate climate it never earns itself back on the electricity bill within the life of the equipment. In a hot one it does, in eight to twelve years. Prices at every size and tier are on the central AC cost by efficiency tier table.
Tip: in a hot climate the 16 SEER class pays for itself, and anywhere else you are buying the two-stage comfort, not the saving. That is a fair thing to buy, as long as you know which one you are paying for.
What Is a Good SEER Rating? AC, Heat Pump and Mini Split
There is no single best SEER rating, only the highest one that pays for itself where you live. For a central AC, a good SEER rating in a moderate climate is the regional minimum or one step above it. In a hot climate, 16 to 18 SEER2 is where the yearly saving is large enough to earn back the price.
For heat pumps the cooling number matters less than it looks. A good SEER rating for a heat pump is whatever comes with the heating performance you need, because in most of the country the unit works more hours in winter than in summer.
Mini splits are sold at much higher ratings, so the choice is wider. Say an 18,000 BTU mini split is offered at 16 SEER and at 22 SEER, and the gap is $1,000. That is 1.5 tons, so the 22 saves about $63 a year at 1,200 cooling hours and about $146 a year at 2,800, at $0.17 per kWh. The upgrade takes 16 years to pay back in the first case and 7 in the second.
So for a mini split in a garage or a spare room the good SEER rating is the cheaper one, and the highest SEER rating only earns its price in a room that is cooled all day through a long summer.
Common SEER Comparisons: Short Answers
Any pair of ratings can be run through the tool above, which is all a SEER comparison calculator or an AC SEER rating calculator does. Add the price gap and it becomes a SEER payback calculator. The difference between 13 SEER and 16 SEER, or between any other pair below, comes from one sum. The percentage saved is always 1 − (old rating ÷ new rating). Worked out for the matchups people compare most, using a 3-ton system, 1,200 cooling hours, and $0.17/kWh:
- 13 SEER vs 15 SEER: about 13% less cooling energy - roughly $75 per year in this scenario. Worth taking when it's a small price bump on a new install; rarely worth replacing a working unit for. To use the tool as a 13 SEER vs 15 SEER savings calculator, enter 13 and 15 and leave both on the SEER scale.
- 14 SEER vs 16 SEER: about 12.5% savings, or roughly $66 per year. The 16-SEER unit is often a two-stage model, so you also gain humidity control and quieter operation - frequently the better buy for reasons beyond the bill.
- 14.3 SEER2 vs 16 SEER2: about 10.6% savings (~$55 per year). This is today's most common new-install decision, since 14.3 SEER2 is the 2023 federal minimum in southern states and for heat pumps everywhere.
- SEER to SEER2 conversion: multiply SEER by 0.955 (a 16 SEER unit ≈ 15.3 SEER2). The calculator above does this automatically whenever one rating is marked SEER and the other SEER2, so the comparison stays apples-to-apples.
Double or halve those dollar figures with your runtime: Phoenix at 2,800 cooling hours saves 2.3× the amounts above, while Seattle at 400 hours saves a third. Hot-climate readers should run their real numbers in the calculator - and to see what any rating means in raw watts and monthly cost, check the AC energy calculator.
10 SEER vs 14 SEER and 10 SEER vs 16 SEER: Replacing an Old Unit
10 SEER vs 14 SEER is the comparison most people with a system from the 1990s or early 2000s are really making, and it is the one upgrade here that is rarely in doubt. On a 3 ton system running 1,200 hours at $0.17 per kWh, the 10 SEER unit costs about $734 a year to run. A 14 cuts that by 28%, or about $210 a year. The 10 SEER vs 16 SEER savings are larger at 37%, about $275 a year, and in a hot climate at 2,800 hours that becomes about $643 a year. The extra $65 a year for the 16 is the same small step discussed above. Tip: the first $210 is the replacement paying you back, so replace the 10 SEER unit for that and judge the step to 16 on its own price.
12 SEER vs 16 SEER: Is a 12 SEER Unit Worth Replacing?
12 SEER vs 16 SEER saves 25% of the cooling electricity, about $153 a year in the same scenario, and 12 vs 14 saves about $87. That is real money but not enough on its own to justify scrapping a 12 SEER system that still works. Tip: do not replace a healthy 12 SEER unit for the savings, and do not put a large repair into one either. When it needs a compressor or a coil, the yearly saving is what tips the decision toward a new system.
13 SEER vs 14 SEER: Usually Not Worth Paying For
This is the smallest step on the whole ladder and it shows. Going from 13 to 14 cuts your cooling energy by about 7%, which on our 3 ton scenario is roughly $40 a year. One homeowner was quoted $1,100 extra for exactly this step and the advice they got back was blunt, take the cheaper one. At that price the payback runs past 25 years. If the difference is more than about $300, this step is not worth taking on the savings alone. The one reason to still do it is if 14 is the legal minimum where you live, which in most of the country it now is.
13 SEER vs 16 SEER: The Step That Usually Does Pay
Skipping the middle rungs is where the math turns friendly. From 13 to 16 you cut cooling energy by about 19%, worth roughly $106 a year in our scenario, and homeowners have reported that jump costing around $1,000 on a new install. So you are looking at about nine years to break even, and the unit should outlive that comfortably. Of every comparison on this page, this is the one most likely to be worth the money. It also tends to move you from a single stage compressor to a two stage one, which you notice in humidity and noise rather than on the bill.
14 SEER vs 15 SEER for One Rating Point
One point of SEER is about 7% less cooling energy, or around $35 a year on a 3 ton system. A homeowner reported paying $600 for this upgrade, which works out at roughly 17 years to break even. Basically, one rating point is never going to pay for itself on its own. Take it when it comes as a small bump on a unit you were buying anyway, and skip it when it is priced as an upgrade.
15 SEER vs 16 SEER and Why the Air Handler Matters
On paper this is a 6% gap, about $31 a year. Too small to justify much of a price difference on its own.
But here is the thing a lot of people miss, and it comes straight from installers. A 15 SEER condenser paired with a two stage air handler and actually configured to run two stage will behave much closer to 16 or 17 SEER in practice. So if you are being quoted a big jump to reach a higher advertised rating, ask what the air handler is first. You may already be buying most of the efficiency you are being asked to pay extra for.
14 SEER vs 17 SEER and 14 SEER vs 18 SEER
These are the big jumps, and the savings do get real. 14 to 17 cuts cooling energy by about 18%, roughly $93 a year, and 14 to 18 cuts it by about 22%, roughly $117 a year. The problem is that units in this range are variable speed machines and the quotes reflect it, often several thousand dollars above a basic unit. At a $3,000 difference even the 14 to 18 step takes about 25 years to pay back. So if you are looking at this range, buy it for the comfort and the quiet, and treat the lower bill as a bonus rather than the reason.
16 SEER vs 18 SEER and 17 SEER vs 20 SEER at the Top End
Up here the percentages shrink fast because savings follow the ratio between the two ratings, not the gap. 16 to 18 saves about $51 a year and 17 to 20 about $65 a year. One homeowner was quoted $3,000 more to go from 15 to 20 on a 3 ton system and was told plainly by installers that they would never break even, which the math agrees with. Past about 18 SEER you are buying comfort features, not payback. There is also a reliability point worth knowing, the more complex the machine the more expensive its parts are, and a control board on a high end unit can cost more than several years of the savings it earned you.
15.2 SEER2 vs 16 SEER: Comparing Two Different Tests
This one trips people up constantly because the two numbers are not measured the same way. 16 SEER converts to about 15.3 SEER2, so a 15.2 SEER2 unit and a 16 SEER unit are very nearly the same machine in efficiency terms. Basically nothing separates them. If one quote lists SEER and another lists SEER2, convert before you compare or you will think you are getting an upgrade that does not exist. Multiply SEER by 0.955 to get SEER2, or divide SEER2 by 0.955 to go the other way.
How to Calculate SEER Savings: The Formula We Use
The math behind the calculator is transparent and based on basic physics. Here is the step-by-step process we use to estimate your costs:
- Determine Capacity in BTUs: We multiply your selected Tonnage by 12,000 to get the total cooling capacity in BTUs per hour.
- Calculate Power Draw (Watts): We divide the capacity (BTUs) by the SEER rating to find out how many Watts the AC draws while running. (Note: If one rating is SEER and the other is SEER2, we multiply the SEER one by 0.955 to convert it to a SEER2 equivalent before doing this math, ensuring a fair apples-to-apples comparison. Two ratings on the same scale are used as written).
- Calculate Annual Energy (kWh): We multiply the Watts by your Annual Cooling Hours, and divide by 1,000 to get the total kilowatt-hours used per year.
- Calculate Annual Cost ($): We multiply the annual kWh by your local electricity rate.
- Determine Savings: Finally, we subtract the new unit's estimated cost from the old unit's estimated cost to find your annual savings!